Tuesday 20 May 2014

“...because someday the information that someone wants to use will be yours” (Citation-Machine)

All libraries should assist young researchers with intellectual property issues as an integrated part of the information search process, and use digital tools to encourage the practice of ethical information skills (Proske, 2010).

Citation of electronic sources has become an increasingly complicated business.

Although they are frequently embedded for download by readers of e-articles, embedded citations are often incorrect; plus the style used might be different to the one required (Park, Mardis & Ury, 2011).
Online resources make inadvertent plagiarism very easy. Besides, different cultures have different attitudes to plagiarism – in some cases it is even a “sincere expression of respect” (Park et al, 2011).
Secondary students find it all highly frustrating and frequently leave citation to the end of the writing process.

There are many citation-making tools available on the web. During a recent Web 2.0 online learning programme, I examined a number of these and then asked my secondary students to trial some of those that are free.
Most of the citation-makers are fairly alike and proved easy to use; but there were some problems. Many students find it difficult to identify the type of source they are using (Park et al, 2011) – so Citation-Machine's elementary guide was better than nothing while NoodleTool's 80+ possible source-types was overwhelming.
However, the severely limited number of source-types, offered by some of the citation-makers, was also a cause of frustration!
The other problem was that not all the citation-makers offered the required style. The students found Neil's Toolbox the most fun and instructional – and indeed said they would use some of the other things it offers (they particularly liked 'Help for the Lazy Researcher') but it doesn't offer APA, as is required by our school.


BibMe came out as the most popular all-rounder.

Zotero, which can be downloaded for most browsers, although it was designed for Mozilla Firefox, is a more complex tool. References can be stored in folders (or more than one folder), folders can be shared - an excellent aide to collaborative group-work; and, although details can be entered manually, Zotero recognises embedded metadata and can create the reference automatically.

Zotero offers plug-ins for Windows, Linux and Mac which proved useful for teaching in-text citation by default. The plug-in allows for the automatic creation of a reference list based on in-text references; without those, however, a reference list has to be created by laborious copy-paste. Those Year 9 students who trialled Zotero are now (finally!) beginning to use in-text citations. (This is not dissimilar to the 'Reference' tab in Microsoft Office Word – but as Zotero is online the folders can be accessed from any computer anywhere.)

There are no adverts – and Zotero is free.

As today's schoolchildren expect to see ICTs integrated into all their learning activities, public, as well as school libraries could use their websites not only as access portals but also as a one-stop tool-box for information skills; one of those tools could be a citation-maker (Proske, 2010). It is most important however, that students using these programs are reminded to check their final reference lists carefully – many small errors were detected and ultimately the responsibility belongs to the writer.

Topic: Digital materials/resources and emerging technologies; Activities: Review e-resource delivering service & Learn how to use a new tool...


References:
Park, S., Mardis, L. & Ury, C.J. (2011). I've lost my identity – oh, there it is … in a style manual: Teaching citation styles and academic honesty Reference Services Review, 39 (1), pp.42-57 DOI: 10.1108/00907321111108105

Proske, J. (2010). The virtual school libr@ry: a necessity for today's school library program. Literacies, learning & libraries, 3(1), 5-20. Retrieved from http://albertaschoollibraries.pbworks.com/f/LiteraciesLearningLibraries+Vol3No1+pdf.pdf#page=7

These are the tools we compared:
Zotero: Georgia State University's Library has published Research Guides on Zotero for those wanting to use it to its full extent: http://research.library.gsu.edu/zotero
Bibliography Makers (2014). http://bibliographymakers.com/
BibMe http://www.bibme.org/
Citation Machine: David Warlick and the Landmark Project (2010) Son of Citation Machine
Citation Producer (2012). http://www.neilstoolbox.com/index.htm
EasyBib http://www.easybib.com/
Neil's Toolbox (2014). http://www.neilstoolbox.com/index.htm
NoodleTools: Noodle Tools Inc http://www.noodletools.com/index.php



No comments:

Post a Comment